Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MATH's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Cryptocurrency Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MATH and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATH | $0.77 | -8.44% | 33.4M | -4.17 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| IBIT | $35.63 | -0.70% | 59.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GBTC | $48.68 | -0.75% | 33.7B | -2858.78 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| ETHA | $14.18 | -0.35% | 8.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BTC | $27.81 | -0.68% | 4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CLSKW | $0.27 | +0.04% | 3.5B | -0.13 | -$2.09 | N/A |
| CLSK | $12.09 | +4.95% | 3.1B | -14.22 | -$0.85 | N/A |
| ARBKL | $5.30 | +196.42% | 3B | N/A | N/A | +20.64% |
| BITB | $34.13 | -0.76% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XRP | $11.16 | -1.15% | 2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (NASDAQ: IBIT)
MATH vs IBIT Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, IBIT has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while IBIT trades at $35.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas IBIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to IBIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check IBIT's competition here
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (AMEX: GBTC)
MATH vs GBTC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, GBTC has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while GBTC trades at $48.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas GBTC's P/E ratio is -2858.78. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GBTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GBTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GBTC's competition here
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (NASDAQ: ETHA)
MATH vs ETHA Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, ETHA has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while ETHA trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas ETHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETHA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ETHA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ETHA's competition here
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (AMEX: BTC)
MATH vs BTC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BTC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BTC trades at $27.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BTC's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW)
MATH vs CLSKW Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while CLSKW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CLSKW's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK)
MATH vs CLSK Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while CLSK trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CLSK's competition here
Argo Blockchain plc 8.75% Senior Notes due 2026 (NASDAQ: ARBKL)
MATH vs ARBKL Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, ARBKL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while ARBKL trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas ARBKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARBKL's ROE of +3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to ARBKL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ARBKL's competition here
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF Trust (AMEX: BITB)
MATH vs BITB Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BITB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BITB trades at $34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BITB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BITB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BITB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BITB's competition here
Bitwise XRP ETF (AMEX: XRP)
MATH vs XRP Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, XRP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while XRP trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas XRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XRP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to XRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check XRP's competition here
Grayscale Ethereum Staking ETF (AMEX: ETHE)
MATH vs ETHE Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, ETHE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while ETHE trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas ETHE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETHE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ETHE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ETHE's competition here
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (AMEX: BLOK)
MATH vs BLOK Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BLOK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BLOK trades at $60.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BLOK's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLOK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BLOK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BLOK's competition here
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (NASDAQ: XXX)
MATH vs XXX Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, XXX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while XXX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas XXX's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XXX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to XXX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check XXX's competition here
FG Nexus Inc. (NASDAQ: FGNXP)
MATH vs FGNXP Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, FGNXP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while FGNXP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas FGNXP's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FGNXP's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to FGNXP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FGNXP's competition here
Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (AMEX: BSOL)
MATH vs BSOL Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BSOL has a market cap of 607.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BSOL trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BSOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSOL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BSOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BSOL's competition here
CoinShares Bitcoin ETF (NASDAQ: BRRR)
MATH vs BRRR Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BRRR has a market cap of 445.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BRRR trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BRRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRRR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BRRR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BRRR's competition here
Digi Power X Inc. (NASDAQ: DGXX)
MATH vs DGXX Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, DGXX has a market cap of 407M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while DGXX trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas DGXX's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DGXX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to DGXX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check DGXX's competition here
Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (AMEX: GDLC)
MATH vs GDLC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, GDLC has a market cap of 387.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while GDLC trades at $28.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas GDLC's P/E ratio is 0.76. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GDLC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GDLC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GDLC's competition here
Coincheck Group N.V. (NASDAQ: CNCK)
MATH vs CNCK Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while CNCK trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is 40.92. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CNCK's competition here
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (NASDAQ: FDIG)
MATH vs FDIG Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, FDIG has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while FDIG trades at $41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas FDIG's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FDIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to FDIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FDIG's competition here
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (NASDAQ: AIPO)
MATH vs AIPO Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, AIPO has a market cap of 244.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while AIPO trades at $30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas AIPO's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIPO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to AIPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AIPO's competition here
Bitwise Ethereum ETF (AMEX: ETHW)
MATH vs ETHW Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, ETHW has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while ETHW trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas ETHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ETHW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ETHW's competition here
Canary XRP ETF (NASDAQ: XRPC)
MATH vs XRPC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, XRPC has a market cap of 231.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while XRPC trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas XRPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XRPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to XRPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check XRPC's competition here
CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (NASDAQ: WGMI)
MATH vs WGMI Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, WGMI has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while WGMI trades at $48.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas WGMI's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WGMI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to WGMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check WGMI's competition here
Global X - Blockchain ETF (NASDAQ: BKCH)
MATH vs BKCH Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BKCH has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BKCH trades at $64.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BKCH's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKCH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BKCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BKCH's competition here
Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (AMEX: STCE)
MATH vs STCE Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, STCE has a market cap of 153.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while STCE trades at $61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas STCE's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STCE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to STCE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check STCE's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRR)
MATH vs BRR Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BRR trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BRR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BRR's competition here
21shares Polkadot ETF Shares of Beneficial Interest (NASDAQ: TDOT)
MATH vs TDOT Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, TDOT has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while TDOT trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas TDOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to TDOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TDOT's competition here
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NASDAQ: NCIQ)
MATH vs NCIQ Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, NCIQ has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while NCIQ trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas NCIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to NCIQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check NCIQ's competition here
XRP ETF (NASDAQ: XRPI)
MATH vs XRPI Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, XRPI has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while XRPI trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas XRPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XRPI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to XRPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check XRPI's competition here
iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (NASDAQ: ETHB)
MATH vs ETHB Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, ETHB has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while ETHB trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas ETHB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETHB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ETHB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ETHB's competition here
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (AMEX: LFGY)
MATH vs LFGY Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, LFGY has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while LFGY trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas LFGY's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to LFGY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check LFGY's competition here
Osprey Bitcoin Trust (NASDAQ: OBTC)
MATH vs OBTC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, OBTC has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while OBTC trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas OBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OBTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to OBTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check OBTC's competition here
State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (NASDAQ: HECO)
MATH vs HECO Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, HECO has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while HECO trades at $63.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas HECO's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HECO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to HECO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check HECO's competition here
First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry and Digital Economy ETF (AMEX: CRPT)
MATH vs CRPT Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, CRPT has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while CRPT trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas CRPT's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CRPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CRPT's competition here
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (AMEX: IBLC)
MATH vs IBLC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, IBLC has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while IBLC trades at $43.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas IBLC's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBLC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to IBLC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check IBLC's competition here
Ethzilla Corp. (NASDAQ: ETHZ)
MATH vs ETHZ Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, ETHZ has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while ETHZ trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas ETHZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETHZ's ROE of -2803.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ETHZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ETHZ's competition here
FG Nexus Inc. (NASDAQ: FGNX)
MATH vs FGNX Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, FGNX has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while FGNX trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas FGNX's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FGNX's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to FGNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FGNX's competition here
ProShares - Ether ETF (AMEX: EETH)
MATH vs EETH Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, EETH has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while EETH trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas EETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EETH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to EETH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check EETH's competition here
Bitwise Proficio Currency Debasement ETF (AMEX: BPRO)
MATH vs BPRO Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BPRO has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BPRO trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BPRO's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BPRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BPRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BPRO's competition here
21Shares 2x Long Sui ETF (NASDAQ: TXXS)
MATH vs TXXS Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, TXXS has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while TXXS trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas TXXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TXXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to TXXS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TXXS's competition here
YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (AMEX: YBIT)
MATH vs YBIT Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, YBIT has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while YBIT trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas YBIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YBIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to YBIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check YBIT's competition here
Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (AMEX: GSOL)
MATH vs GSOL Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, GSOL has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while GSOL trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas GSOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSOL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GSOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GSOL's competition here
Brera Holdings PLC (NASDAQ: SLMT)
MATH vs SLMT Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, SLMT has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while SLMT trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas SLMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLMT's ROE of -4.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SLMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SLMT's competition here
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (NASDAQ: BTGD)
MATH vs BTGD Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BTGD has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BTGD trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BTGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTGD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BTGD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BTGD's competition here
Volatility Shares Trust - Solana ETF (NASDAQ: SOLZ)
MATH vs SOLZ Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, SOLZ has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while SOLZ trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas SOLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOLZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SOLZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SOLZ's competition here
Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (NASDAQ: MAXI)
MATH vs MAXI Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, MAXI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while MAXI trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas MAXI's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MAXI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MAXI's competition here
ProShares - Ultra XRP ETF (AMEX: UXRP)
MATH vs UXRP Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, UXRP has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while UXRP trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas UXRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UXRP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to UXRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check UXRP's competition here
Global X - Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (NASDAQ: BITS)
MATH vs BITS Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BITS has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BITS trades at $55.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BITS's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BITS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BITS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BITS's competition here
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (AMEX: BCDF)
MATH vs BCDF Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BCDF has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BCDF trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BCDF's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BCDF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BCDF's competition here
Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (AMEX: OWNB)
MATH vs OWNB Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, OWNB has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while OWNB trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas OWNB's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OWNB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to OWNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check OWNB's competition here
Canary Staked SUI ETF (NASDAQ: SUIS)
MATH vs SUIS Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, SUIS has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while SUIS trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas SUIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SUIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SUIS's competition here
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (NASDAQ: DECO)
MATH vs DECO Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, DECO has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while DECO trades at $73.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas DECO's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DECO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to DECO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check DECO's competition here
T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF (AMEX: TKNZ)
MATH vs TKNZ Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, TKNZ has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while TKNZ trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas TKNZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TKNZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to TKNZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TKNZ's competition here
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (AMEX: BLOX)
MATH vs BLOX Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BLOX has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BLOX trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BLOX's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLOX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BLOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BLOX's competition here
Bitwise Funds Trust (AMEX: IMST)
MATH vs IMST Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, IMST has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while IMST trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas IMST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IMST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to IMST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check IMST's competition here
Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (NASDAQ: BHDG)
MATH vs BHDG Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BHDG has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BHDG trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BHDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BHDG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BHDG's competition here
Hashdex Bitcoin Futures ETF (AMEX: DEFI)
MATH vs DEFI Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, DEFI has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while DEFI trades at $71.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas DEFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DEFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to DEFI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check DEFI's competition here
21Shares Hyperliquid ETF (NASDAQ: THYP)
MATH vs THYP Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, THYP has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while THYP trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas THYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to THYP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to THYP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check THYP's competition here
ProShares - Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight ETF (AMEX: BETH)
MATH vs BETH Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BETH has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BETH trades at $34.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BETH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BETH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BETH's competition here
USCF Oil Plus Bitcoin Strategy Fund (AMEX: WTIB)
MATH vs WTIB Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, WTIB has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while WTIB trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas WTIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WTIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to WTIB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check WTIB's competition here
ProShares - Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight ETF (AMEX: BETE)
MATH vs BETE Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BETE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BETE trades at $30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BETE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BETE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BETE's competition here
VanEck Solana ETF (NASDAQ: VSOL)
MATH vs VSOL Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, VSOL has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while VSOL trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas VSOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VSOL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to VSOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check VSOL's competition here
Grayscale Funds Trust (AMEX: BTCC)
MATH vs BTCC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BTCC has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BTCC trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BTCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BTCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BTCC's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRRWW)
MATH vs BRRWW Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BRRWW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BRRWW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BRRWW's P/E ratio is -18.16. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRRWW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BRRWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BRRWW's competition here
Canary Litecoin ETF (NASDAQ: LTCC)
MATH vs LTCC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, LTCC has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while LTCC trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas LTCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LTCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to LTCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check LTCC's competition here
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (AMEX: MNRS)
MATH vs MNRS Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, MNRS has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while MNRS trades at $34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas MNRS's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MNRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MNRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MNRS's competition here
Defiance Digital Revolution ETF (AMEX: NFTZ)
MATH vs NFTZ Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, NFTZ has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while NFTZ trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas NFTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NFTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to NFTZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check NFTZ's competition here
GSR Crypto Core3 ETF (NASDAQ: BESO)
MATH vs BESO Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BESO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BESO trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BESO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BESO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BESO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BESO's competition here
FG Nexus Inc. (NASDAQ: FGF)
MATH vs FGF Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, FGF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while FGF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas FGF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FGF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to FGF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FGF's competition here
Bitwise Web3 ETF (AMEX: BWEB)
MATH vs BWEB Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BWEB has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BWEB trades at $74.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BWEB's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BWEB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BWEB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BWEB's competition here
Bitwise Trendwise BTC/ETH and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF (AMEX: BTOP)
MATH vs BTOP Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BTOP has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BTOP trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BTOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BTOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BTOP's competition here
21Shares 2x Long HYPE ETF (NASDAQ: TXXH)
MATH vs TXXH Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, TXXH has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while TXXH trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas TXXH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TXXH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to TXXH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TXXH's competition here
Bitwise Trendwise Ether and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF (AMEX: AETH)
MATH vs AETH Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, AETH has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while AETH trades at $29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas AETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AETH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to AETH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AETH's competition here
Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (NASDAQ: GAVA)
MATH vs GAVA Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, GAVA has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while GAVA trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas GAVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GAVA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GAVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GAVA's competition here
Bitwise Funds Trust (AMEX: ICOI)
MATH vs ICOI Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, ICOI has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while ICOI trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas ICOI's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICOI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ICOI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ICOI's competition here
Bitwise Chainlink ETF Beneficial Interest (AMEX: CLNK)
MATH vs CLNK Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, CLNK has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while CLNK trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas CLNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CLNK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CLNK's competition here
Global X - Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (AMEX: BTRN)
MATH vs BTRN Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BTRN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BTRN trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BTRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTRN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BTRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BTRN's competition here
Bitwise Hyperliquid ETF (AMEX: BHYP)
MATH vs BHYP Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BHYP has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BHYP trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BHYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHYP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BHYP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BHYP's competition here
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (AMEX: BFJL)
MATH vs BFJL Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BFJL has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BFJL trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BFJL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BFJL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BFJL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BFJL's competition here
Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (AMEX: BCOR)
MATH vs BCOR Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BCOR has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BCOR trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BCOR's P/E ratio is 341.75. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCOR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BCOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BCOR's competition here
VanEck Digital Assets Mining ETF (NASDAQ: DAM)
MATH vs DAM Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, DAM has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while DAM trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas DAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to DAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check DAM's competition here
Direxion Daily Ether Bull 2X ETF (AMEX: EVMU)
MATH vs EVMU Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, EVMU has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while EVMU trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas EVMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to EVMU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check EVMU's competition here
Volt Crypto Industry and Equity ETF (AMEX: BTCR)
MATH vs BTCR Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BTCR has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BTCR trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BTCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTCR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BTCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BTCR's competition here
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (AMEX: BFAP)
MATH vs BFAP Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, BFAP has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while BFAP trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas BFAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BFAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BFAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BFAP's competition here
Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (AMEX: ETCO)
MATH vs ETCO Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, ETCO has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while ETCO trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas ETCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ETCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ETCO's competition here
Canary Marinade Solana ETF (NASDAQ: SOLC)
MATH vs SOLC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, SOLC has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while SOLC trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas SOLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOLC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SOLC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SOLC's competition here
VanEck BNB ETF Common Shares of Beneficial Interest (NASDAQ: VBNB)
MATH vs VBNB Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, VBNB has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while VBNB trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas VBNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VBNB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to VBNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check VBNB's competition here
CoinShares Altcoins ETF (NASDAQ: DIME)
MATH vs DIME Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, DIME has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while DIME trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas DIME's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DIME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to DIME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check DIME's competition here
Valkyrie Balance Sheet Opportunities ETF (NASDAQ: VBB)
MATH vs VBB Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, VBB has a market cap of 859.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while VBB trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas VBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VBB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to VBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check VBB's competition here
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF (NASDAQ: XEY)
MATH vs XEY Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, XEY has a market cap of 593.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while XEY trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas XEY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to XEY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check XEY's competition here
21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 ex-BTC Index ETF (AMEX: TXBC)
MATH vs TXBC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, TXBC has a market cap of 522.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while TXBC trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas TXBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TXBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to TXBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TXBC's competition here
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (NASDAQ: SSS)
MATH vs SSS Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, SSS has a market cap of 520.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while SSS trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas SSS's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SSS's competition here
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Ethereum 75/25 Strategy ETF (NASDAQ: EEE)
MATH vs EEE Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, EEE has a market cap of 508.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while EEE trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas EEE's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to EEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check EEE's competition here
AdvisorShares Managed Bitcoin Strategy ETF (AMEX: CRYP)
MATH vs CRYP Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, CRYP has a market cap of 401K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while CRYP trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas CRYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRYP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CRYP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CRYP's competition here
Bitwise Funds Trust (AMEX: ICRC)
MATH vs ICRC Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, ICRC has a market cap of 268.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while ICRC trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas ICRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICRC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ICRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ICRC's competition here
21Shares Active Crypto ETF (NASDAQ: TKNS)
MATH vs TKNS Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, TKNS has a market cap of 251.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while TKNS trades at $21.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas TKNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TKNS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to TKNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TKNS's competition here
21Shares Canton Network ETF (NASDAQ: TCAN)
MATH vs TCAN Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, TCAN has a market cap of 163.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while TCAN trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas TCAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to TCAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check TCAN's competition here
Ethzilla Corp. (NASDAQ: ETHZW)
MATH vs ETHZW Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, ETHZW has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while ETHZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas ETHZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETHZW's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to ETHZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ETHZW's competition here
ProShares - CoinDesk 20 Crypto ETF (AMEX: KRYP)
MATH vs KRYP Comparison August 2026
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 33.4M. In comparison, KRYP has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.77 on the NASDAQ, while KRYP trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas KRYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KRYP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to KRYP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check KRYP's competition here