Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MS-PA's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MS-PA and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS-PA | $18.04 | -0.11% | 63.8B | 1.45 | $12.47 | +2.25% |
| GS-PC | $18.30 | +0.43% | 315B | 0.26 | $69.55 | +1.94% |
| MS | $190.58 | +1.61% | 300.6B | 15.41 | $12.37 | +2.25% |
| MS-PO | $15.32 | -0.52% | 294B | 1.23 | $12.47 | +2.25% |
| MS-PF | $24.08 | +0.58% | 292.5B | 1.94 | $12.47 | +2.25% |
| MS-PP | $22.80 | -0.44% | 292.4B | 1.83 | $12.47 | +2.25% |
| MS-PK | $20.56 | +0.05% | 292.2B | 1.65 | $12.47 | +2.25% |
| MS-PI | $22.40 | +0.40% | 292.1B | 1.80 | $12.47 | +2.25% |
| MS-PL | $17.32 | -0.57% | 290.8B | 1.39 | $12.47 | +2.25% |
| MS-PQ | $23.51 | -1.01% | 290.2B | 1.88 | $12.50 | +2.25% |
Stock Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PFD 1/1000 C (NYSE: GS-PC)
MS-PA vs GS-PC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 315B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GS-PC trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PC's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)
MS-PA vs MS Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 300.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MS trades at $190.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PO)
MS-PA vs MS-PO Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 294B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MS-PO trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 1.23. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PO's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PF)
MS-PA vs MS-PF Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 292.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MS-PF trades at $24.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PF's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PP)
MS-PA vs MS-PP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 292.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MS-PP trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PP's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PK)
MS-PA vs MS-PK Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 292.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MS-PK trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PK's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PI)
MS-PA vs MS-PI Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 292.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MS-PI trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PI's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PL)
MS-PA vs MS-PL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 290.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MS-PL trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is similarly volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PL's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PQ)
MS-PA vs MS-PQ Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 290.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MS-PQ trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PQ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PE)
MS-PA vs MS-PE Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 290B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MS-PE trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PE's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)
MS-PA vs GS Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 267.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GS trades at $926.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PD)
MS-PA vs GS-PD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 189.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GS-PD trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PA)
MS-PA vs GS-PA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 185.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GS-PA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PA's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW)
MS-PA vs SCHW Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 160.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SCHW trades at $92.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCHW's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PD)
MS-PA vs SCHW-PD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 158.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SCHW-PD trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PJ)
MS-PA vs SCHW-PJ Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 157.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SCHW-PJ trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PJ)
MS-PA vs GS-PJ Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PJ's competition here
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD)
MS-PA vs HOOD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while HOOD trades at $84.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 37.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HOOD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PK)
MS-PA vs GS-PK Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PK's competition here
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR)
MS-PA vs NMR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while NMR trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check NMR's competition here
Tradeweb Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: TW)
MS-PA vs TW Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while TW trades at $130.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TW's competition here
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LPLA)
MS-PA vs LPLA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while LPLA trades at $301.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check LPLA's competition here
Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL)
MS-PA vs CRCL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while CRCL trades at $67.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is 45.97. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRCL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CRCL's competition here
Futu Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FUTU)
MS-PA vs FUTU Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while FUTU trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FUTU's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNP)
MS-PA vs BMNP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, BMNP has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while BMNP trades at $97.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas BMNP's P/E ratio is 1148.94. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMNP's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to BMNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BMNP's competition here
Evercore Inc. (NYSE: EVR)
MS-PA vs EVR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while EVR trades at $298.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check EVR's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNR)
MS-PA vs BMNR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while BMNR trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BMNR's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp (NYSE: SF)
MS-PA vs SF Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SF trades at $73.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF-PB)
MS-PA vs SF-PB Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SF-PB trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF-PB's competition here
SCE Trust IV (NYSE: SCE-PJ)
MS-PA vs SCE-PJ Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE: JEF)
MS-PA vs JEF Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while JEF trades at $47.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check JEF's competition here
XP Inc. (NASDAQ: XP)
MS-PA vs XP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while XP trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check XP's competition here
Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ: HUT)
MS-PA vs HUT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while HUT trades at $61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HUT's competition here
StoneX Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SNEX)
MS-PA vs SNEX Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SNEX trades at $58.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SNEX's competition here
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
MS-PA vs RIOT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while RIOT trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check RIOT's competition here
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF)
MS-PA vs WULF Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while WULF trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WULF's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check WULF's competition here
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX)
MS-PA vs MKTX Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MKTX trades at $165.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MKTX's competition here
Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE: RJF-PA)
MS-PA vs RJF-PA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check RJF-PA's competition here
Marex Group Limited (NASDAQ: MRX)
MS-PA vs MRX Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MRX trades at $73.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MRX's competition here
Galaxy Digital (NASDAQ: GLXY)
MS-PA vs GLXY Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GLXY trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -19.24. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GLXY's competition here
Virtu Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VIRT)
MS-PA vs VIRT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while VIRT trades at $59.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check VIRT's competition here
BGC Group, Inc (NASDAQ: BGC)
MS-PA vs BGC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while BGC trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BGC's competition here
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FIGR)
MS-PA vs FIGR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while FIGR trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FIGR's competition here
Moelis & Company (NYSE: MC)
MS-PA vs MC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MC trades at $56.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MC's competition here
Lazard Inc (NYSE: LAZ)
MS-PA vs LAZ Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while LAZ trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check LAZ's competition here
Miami International Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: MIAX)
MS-PA vs MIAX Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MIAX trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MIAX's competition here
MARA Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA)
MS-PA vs MARA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MARA trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MARA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MARA's competition here
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc Common Stock (NASDAQ: PURR)
MS-PA vs PURR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while PURR trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PURR's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check PURR's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF-PC)
MS-PA vs SF-PC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SF-PC trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF-PC's competition here
eToro Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: ETOR)
MS-PA vs ETOR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while ETOR trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check ETOR's competition here
TOP Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: TOP)
MS-PA vs TOP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while TOP trades at $14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -97.35. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TOP's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW)
MS-PA vs CLSKW Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while CLSKW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CLSKW's competition here
Stifel Financial Corporation 5.20% Senior Notes due 2047 (NYSE: SFB)
MS-PA vs SFB Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SFB trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SFB's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK)
MS-PA vs CLSK Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while CLSK trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CLSK's competition here
BGC Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGCP)
MS-PA vs BGCP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BGCP's competition here
Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFRW)
MS-PA vs CIFRW Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CIFRW's competition here
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP)
MS-PA vs PWP Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while PWP trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check PWP's competition here
AMTD International Inc. (NYSE: HKIB)
MS-PA vs HKIB Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HKIB's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF-PD)
MS-PA vs SF-PD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SF-PD trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF-PD's competition here
Sharplink, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBET)
MS-PA vs SBET Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SBET trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SBET's competition here
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRK)
MS-PA vs AMRK Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check AMRK's competition here
Cowen Inc. (NASDAQ: COWN)
MS-PA vs COWN Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check COWN's competition here
Gold.com, Inc. (NYSE: GOLD)
MS-PA vs GOLD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GOLD trades at $37.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GOLD's competition here
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (NYSE: OPY)
MS-PA vs OPY Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 970.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while OPY trades at $91.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check OPY's competition here
Lincoln International Inc. (NYSE: LCLN)
MS-PA vs LCLN Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 943.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while LCLN trades at $27.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LCLN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check LCLN's competition here
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR)
MS-PA vs TIGR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 723M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while TIGR trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TIGR's competition here
Associated Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: AC)
MS-PA vs AC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check AC's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
MS-PA vs CD Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 565.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while CD trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -128.50. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CD's competition here
MMTec, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTC)
MS-PA vs MTC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MTC has a market cap of 563.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MTC trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MTC's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTC's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MTC's competition here
CoinShares PLC Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CSHR)
MS-PA vs CSHR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 485M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while CSHR trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CSHR's competition here
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BTGO)
MS-PA vs BTGO Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 473.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while BTGO trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BTGO's competition here
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: MFH)
MS-PA vs MFH Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MFH's competition here
American Bitcoin Corp (NASDAQ: ABTC)
MS-PA vs ABTC Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 386M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while ABTC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check ABTC's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRR)
MS-PA vs BRR Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 368.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while BRR trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BRR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BRR's competition here
Gemini Space Station, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEMI)
MS-PA vs GEMI Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 332.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GEMI trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GEMI's competition here
Bit Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBT)
MS-PA vs BTBT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while BTBT trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BTBT's competition here
Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE: GHL)
MS-PA vs GHL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GHL's competition here
Silvia, Inc. (NASDAQ: SVIA)
MS-PA vs SVIA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SVIA has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SVIA trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SVIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SVIA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SVIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SVIA's competition here
Coincheck Group N.V. (NASDAQ: CNCK)
MS-PA vs CNCK Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 218.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while CNCK trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CNCK's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFUW)
MS-PA vs FUFUW Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while FUFUW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FUFUW's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN)
MS-PA vs SWIN Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SWIN's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFU)
MS-PA vs FUFU Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while FUFU trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -21.99. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FUFU's competition here
DeFi Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: DEFT)
MS-PA vs DEFT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 128.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while DEFT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check DEFT's competition here
Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)
MS-PA vs NAKA Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 108.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while NAKA trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check NAKA's competition here
Waton Financial Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: WTF)
MS-PA vs WTF Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, WTF has a market cap of 92.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while WTF trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas WTF's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WTF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WTF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check WTF's competition here
Top KingWin Ltd (NASDAQ: TCJH)
MS-PA vs TCJH Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TCJH's competition here
Siebert Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: SIEB)
MS-PA vs SIEB Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SIEB trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -59.61. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SIEB's competition here
GRIID Infrastructure Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: GRDI)
MS-PA vs GRDI Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GRDI's competition here
Scully Royalty Ltd. (NYSE: SRL)
MS-PA vs SRL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SRL trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -27.71. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SRL's competition here
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: GREE)
MS-PA vs GREE Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GREE trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GREE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GREE's competition here
BTCS Inc. (NASDAQ: BTCS)
MS-PA vs BTCS Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while BTCS trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BTCS's competition here
Adit EdTech Acquisition Corp. R (NYSE: ADEX-WT)
MS-PA vs ADEX-WT Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH)
MS-PA vs MATH Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while MATH trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MATH's competition here
Cango Inc. (NYSE: CANG)
MS-PA vs CANG Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while CANG trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CANG's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CANG's competition here
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDIG)
MS-PA vs SDIG Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SDIG's competition here
Heritage Global Inc. (NASDAQ: HGBL)
MS-PA vs HGBL Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while HGBL trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGBL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HGBL's competition here
The9 Limited (NASDAQ: NCTY)
MS-PA vs NCTY Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while NCTY trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check NCTY's competition here
Cohen & Company Inc. (AMEX: COHN)
MS-PA vs COHN Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while COHN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check COHN's competition here
Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GRAN)
MS-PA vs GRAN Comparison November 2026
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 63.8B. In comparison, GRAN has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $18.04 on the NYSE, while GRAN trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.45, whereas GRAN's P/E ratio is -127.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRAN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GRAN's competition here