Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TEN-PF's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TEN-PF and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN-PF | $25.99 | -0.12% | 765.5M | 2.63 | $9.87 | +4.46% |
| FRO | $43.87 | -0.95% | 9.8B | 6.57 | $6.68 | +14.08% |
| KEX | $124.16 | -0.20% | 6.6B | 17.89 | $6.94 | N/A |
| MATX | $207.00 | -0.37% | 6.2B | 13.84 | $14.96 | +0.72% |
| INSW | $98.25 | +1.87% | 5B | 11.52 | $8.52 | +12.87% |
| CMBT | $16.65 | +0.48% | 4.8B | 5.72 | $2.91 | +8.67% |
| HAFN | $9.10 | -0.98% | 4.8B | 6.89 | $1.32 | +12.55% |
| STNG | $80.55 | +1.17% | 4B | 10.68 | $7.54 | +2.21% |
| TRMD | $34.30 | -0.69% | 3.5B | 5.65 | $6.07 | +12.89% |
| ZIM | $28.10 | -1.44% | 3.4B | -312.22 | -$0.09 | +4.23% |
Stock Comparison
Frontline Plc (NYSE: FRO)
TEN-PF vs FRO Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while FRO trades at $43.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check FRO's competition here
Kirby Corporation (NYSE: KEX)
TEN-PF vs KEX Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while KEX trades at $124.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to KEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check KEX's competition here
Matson, Inc. (NYSE: MATX)
TEN-PF vs MATX Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while MATX trades at $207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to MATX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check MATX's competition here
International Seaways, Inc. (NYSE: INSW)
TEN-PF vs INSW Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while INSW trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check INSW's competition here
Cmb.Tech N.V. (NYSE: CMBT)
TEN-PF vs CMBT Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CMBT trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CMBT's competition here
Hafnia Limited (NYSE: HAFN)
TEN-PF vs HAFN Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while HAFN trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check HAFN's competition here
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (NYSE: STNG)
TEN-PF vs STNG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while STNG trades at $80.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check STNG's competition here
TORM plc (NASDAQ: TRMD)
TEN-PF vs TRMD Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while TRMD trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check TRMD's competition here
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (NYSE: ZIM)
TEN-PF vs ZIM Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while ZIM trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is -312.22. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check ZIM's competition here
DHT Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DHT)
TEN-PF vs DHT Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while DHT trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check DHT's competition here
BW LPG Limited (NYSE: BWLP)
TEN-PF vs BWLP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while BWLP trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check BWLP's competition here
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (NASDAQ: SBLK)
TEN-PF vs SBLK Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SBLK trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SBLK's competition here
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (NYSE: TNK)
TEN-PF vs TNK Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while TNK trades at $85.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check TNK's competition here
Danaos Corporation (NYSE: DAC)
TEN-PF vs DAC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while DAC trades at $147.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to DAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check DAC's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB-PC)
TEN-PF vs SB-PC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SB-PC trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 33.79. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SB-PC's competition here
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (NYSE: ECO)
TEN-PF vs ECO Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while ECO trades at $81.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check ECO's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB-PD)
TEN-PF vs SB-PD Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SB-PD trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SB-PD's competition here
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NYSE: NMM)
TEN-PF vs NMM Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while NMM trades at $87.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check NMM's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PC)
TEN-PF vs CMRE-PC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
SFL Corporation Ltd (NYSE: SFL)
TEN-PF vs SFL Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SFL trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to SFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SFL's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE)
TEN-PF vs CMRE Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CMRE trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CMRE's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GSL)
TEN-PF vs GSL Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while GSL trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to GSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check GSL's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GSL-PB)
TEN-PF vs GSL-PB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while GSL-PB trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check GSL-PB's competition here
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE: NAT)
TEN-PF vs NAT Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while NAT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check NAT's competition here
FLEX LNG Ltd (NYSE: FLNG)
TEN-PF vs FLNG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while FLNG trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check FLNG's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PB)
TEN-PF vs CMRE-PB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PD)
TEN-PF vs CMRE-PD Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PD trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
Scorpio Tankers Inc. 7.00% Seni (NYSE: SBBA)
TEN-PF vs SBBA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SBBA's competition here
Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NVGS)
TEN-PF vs NVGS Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while NVGS trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check NVGS's competition here
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (NASDAQ: CCEC)
TEN-PF vs CCEC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CCEC trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CCEC's competition here
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (NYSE: GNK)
TEN-PF vs GNK Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while GNK trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check GNK's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PE)
TEN-PF vs CMRE-PE Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
Capital Product Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: CPLP)
TEN-PF vs CPLP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CPLP's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB)
TEN-PF vs SB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 861.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SB trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SB's competition here
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (NYSE: HSHP)
TEN-PF vs HSHP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 751.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while HSHP trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check HSHP's competition here
Ardmore Shipping Corporation (NYSE: ASC)
TEN-PF vs ASC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 731.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while ASC trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check ASC's competition here
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (NASDAQ: PANL)
TEN-PF vs PANL Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 559.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while PANL trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check PANL's competition here
Cool Company Ltd. (NYSE: CLCO)
TEN-PF vs CLCO Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CLCO's competition here
Costamare Bulkers Holdings Limited (NYSE: CMDB)
TEN-PF vs CMDB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 470.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CMDB trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMDB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CMDB's competition here
Euroseas Ltd. (NASDAQ: ESEA)
TEN-PF vs ESEA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 458.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while ESEA trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check ESEA's competition here
Eneti Inc. (NYSE: NETI)
TEN-PF vs NETI Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to NETI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check NETI's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIP)
TEN-PF vs SHIP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 317.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SHIP trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SHIP's competition here
StealthGas Inc. (NASDAQ: GASS)
TEN-PF vs GASS Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 297.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while GASS trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check GASS's competition here
Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX)
TEN-PF vs DSX Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 293.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while DSX trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check DSX's competition here
KNOT Offshore Partners LP (NYSE: KNOP)
TEN-PF vs KNOP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 290.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while KNOP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check KNOP's competition here
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (NYSE: SMHI)
TEN-PF vs SMHI Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SMHI trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SMHI's competition here
Euroseas Ltd. Ex-Distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: ESEAV)
TEN-PF vs ESEAV Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check ESEAV's competition here
OceanPal Inc. (NASDAQ: OP)
TEN-PF vs OP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while OP trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check OP's competition here
Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX-PB)
TEN-PF vs DSX-PB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while DSX-PB trades at $26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 88.37. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check DSX-PB's competition here
Toro Corp. (NASDAQ: TORO)
TEN-PF vs TORO Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while TORO trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -36.36. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check TORO's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG-PA)
TEN-PF vs DLNG-PA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 120.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check DLNG-PA's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG)
TEN-PF vs DLNG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while DLNG trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check DLNG's competition here
EuroDry Ltd. (NASDAQ: EDRY)
TEN-PF vs EDRY Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while EDRY trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EDRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check EDRY's competition here
Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: HMR)
TEN-PF vs HMR Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while HMR trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HMR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check HMR's competition here
Globus Maritime Limited (NASDAQ: GLBS)
TEN-PF vs GLBS Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while GLBS trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLBS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check GLBS's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXS)
TEN-PF vs PXS Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while PXS trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check PXS's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM)
TEN-PF vs NM Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check NM's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM-PH)
TEN-PF vs NM-PH Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check NM-PH's competition here
AI OKTO Corp. (NASDAQ: AIOK)
TEN-PF vs AIOK Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, AIOK has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while AIOK trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas AIOK's P/E ratio is -31.78. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIOK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to AIOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check AIOK's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXSAP)
TEN-PF vs PXSAP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check PXSAP's competition here
Euroholdings Ltd (NASDAQ: EHLDV)
TEN-PF vs EHLDV Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check EHLDV's competition here
Euroholdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: EHLD)
TEN-PF vs EHLD Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while EHLD trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check EHLD's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM-PG)
TEN-PF vs NM-PG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check NM-PG's competition here
Toro Corp. Common Stock Ex-distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: TOROV)
TEN-PF vs TOROV Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check TOROV's competition here
Performance Shipping Inc. (NASDAQ: PSHG)
TEN-PF vs PSHG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while PSHG trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 2.26. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check PSHG's competition here
Caravelle International Group (NASDAQ: CACO)
TEN-PF vs CACO Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CACO's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CACO's competition here
United Maritime Corporation (NASDAQ: USEA)
TEN-PF vs USEA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while USEA trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check USEA's competition here
Vantage Corp (AMEX: VNTG)
TEN-PF vs VNTG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while VNTG trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check VNTG's competition here
High-Trend International Group (NASDAQ: HTCO)
TEN-PF vs HTCO Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while HTCO trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check HTCO's competition here
Castor Maritime Inc. (NASDAQ: CTRM)
TEN-PF vs CTRM Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CTRM trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CTRM's competition here
Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: NCT)
TEN-PF vs NCT Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while NCT trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCT's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check NCT's competition here
Rubico Inc. (NASDAQ: RUBI)
TEN-PF vs RUBI Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while RUBI trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check RUBI's competition here
Uni-Fuels Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: UFG)
TEN-PF vs UFG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while UFG trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UFG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check UFG's competition here
Top Ships Inc. (AMEX: TOPS)
TEN-PF vs TOPS Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while TOPS trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check TOPS's competition here
Icon Energy Corp. (NASDAQ: ICON)
TEN-PF vs ICON Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 335.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while ICON trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check ICON's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXSAW)
TEN-PF vs PXSAW Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check PXSAW's competition here
C3is Inc. (NASDAQ: CISS)
TEN-PF vs CISS Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 112K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while CISS trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check CISS's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIPW)
TEN-PF vs SHIPW Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SHIPW's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIPZ)
TEN-PF vs SHIPZ Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SHIPZ's competition here
Gener8 Maritime, Inc. (NASDAQ: GNRT)
TEN-PF vs GNRT Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, GNRT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while GNRT trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas GNRT's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to GNRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check GNRT's competition here
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. 8.30% SR NT 22 (NASDAQ: SBLKZ)
TEN-PF vs SBLKZ Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check SBLKZ's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. 8.00% S (NYSE: GSLD)
TEN-PF vs GSLD Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, GSLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while GSLD trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas GSLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GSLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is more volatile compared to GSLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check GSLD's competition here
Rand Logistics Inc (NASDAQ: RLOG)
TEN-PF vs RLOG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PF) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PF stands at 765.5M. In comparison, RLOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PF is priced at $25.99 on the NYSE, while RLOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.63, whereas RLOG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TEN-PF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RLOG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PF is less volatile compared to RLOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PF.Check RLOG's competition here