Clarivate Plc (CLVT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLVT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLVT | $2.21 | +0.45% | 1.4B | -10.48 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| IBM | $272.24 | -0.95% | 255.8B | 24.09 | $11.30 | +2.47% |
| ACN | $170.28 | +1.65% | 104.8B | 13.97 | $12.19 | +3.75% |
| INFY | $11.74 | +1.21% | 47.6B | 14.67 | $0.80 | +4.39% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $53.78 | +1.36% | 28.7B | 8.31 | $6.47 | N/A |
| CTSH | $52.17 | +1.93% | 24.7B | 11.32 | $4.61 | +2.46% |
| WIT | $2.20 | +2.33% | 23.1B | 16.96 | $0.13 | +5.56% |
| FIS | $39.20 | +2.22% | 20.3B | 7.60 | $5.16 | +4.31% |
| CDW | $132.19 | +2.37% | 16.9B | 16.10 | $8.21 | +1.93% |
Stock Comparison
CLVT vs IBM Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 255.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while IBM trades at $272.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check IBM's competition here
CLVT vs ACN Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 104.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while ACN trades at $170.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check ACN's competition here
CLVT vs INFY Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while INFY trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check INFY's competition here
CLVT vs FI Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check FI's competition here
CLVT vs FISV Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while FISV trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check FISV's competition here
CLVT vs CTSH Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CTSH trades at $52.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CTSH's competition here
CLVT vs WIT Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while WIT trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check WIT's competition here
CLVT vs FIS Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while FIS trades at $39.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check FIS's competition here
CLVT vs CDW Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CDW trades at $132.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CDW's competition here
CLVT vs BR Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while BR trades at $144.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check BR's competition here
CLVT vs LDOS Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while LDOS trades at $122.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check LDOS's competition here
CLVT vs GIB Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while GIB trades at $66.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check GIB's competition here
CLVT vs APLD Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while APLD trades at $42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -112.37. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check APLD's competition here
CLVT vs AUR Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while AUR trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check AUR's competition here
CLVT vs CACI Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CACI trades at $519.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CACI's competition here
CLVT vs JKHY Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while JKHY trades at $128.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check JKHY's competition here
CLVT vs INGM Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while INGM trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check INGM's competition here
CLVT vs GDS Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while GDS trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check GDS's competition here
CLVT vs G Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while G trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas G's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check G's competition here
CLVT vs DLB Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while DLB trades at $52.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check DLB's competition here
CLVT vs EPAM Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while EPAM trades at $95.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check EPAM's competition here
CLVT vs SAIC Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while SAIC trades at $113.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check SAIC's competition here
CLVT vs EXLS Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while EXLS trades at $28.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check EXLS's competition here
CLVT vs NCR Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check NCR's competition here
CLVT vs PSFE-WT Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
CLVT vs WAY Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while WAY trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check WAY's competition here
CLVT vs KEEL Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while KEEL trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check KEEL's competition here
CLVT vs WNS Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check WNS's competition here
CLVT vs INOD Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while INOD trades at $100.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 90.09. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check INOD's competition here
CLVT vs PRFT Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check PRFT's competition here
CLVT vs PAY Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while PAY trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check PAY's competition here
CLVT vs KD Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while KD trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check KD's competition here
CLVT vs NYAX Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while NYAX trades at $67.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 84.95. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check NYAX's competition here
CLVT vs VNET Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while VNET trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check VNET's competition here
CLVT vs NIQ Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while NIQ trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check NIQ's competition here
CLVT vs FORTY Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while FORTY trades at $117.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check FORTY's competition here
CLVT vs FLYW Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while FLYW trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 61.29. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check FLYW's competition here
CLVT vs GLOB Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while GLOB trades at $37.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check GLOB's competition here
CLVT vs CNXC Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CNXC trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CNXC's competition here
CLVT vs AI Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while AI trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check AI's competition here
CLVT vs DXC Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while DXC trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 91.70. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check DXC's competition here
CLVT vs BBAI-WT Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
CLVT vs TWKS Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check TWKS's competition here
CLVT vs BBAI Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while BBAI trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check BBAI's competition here
CLVT vs BTCM Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check BTCM's competition here
CLVT vs VYX Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while VYX trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check VYX's competition here
CLVT vs WYFI Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 899.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while WYFI trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -23.53. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check WYFI's competition here
CLVT vs ASGN Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while ASGN trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check ASGN's competition here
CLVT vs EFOR Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 861M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while EFOR trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check EFOR's competition here
CLVT vs MGIC Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while MGIC trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check MGIC's competition here
CLVT vs CTLP Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CTLP trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CTLP's competition here
CLVT vs CLVT-PA Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
CLVT vs VRRM Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 709.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while VRRM trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check VRRM's competition here
CLVT vs PHLT Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check PHLT's competition here
CLVT vs NABL Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 605.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while NABL trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -64.30. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check NABL's competition here
CLVT vs AUROW Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 588M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while AUROW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check AUROW's competition here
CLVT vs SHAZ Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 577.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while SHAZ trades at $62.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check SHAZ's competition here
CLVT vs GDYN Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 528.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while GDYN trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 105.33. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check GDYN's competition here
CLVT vs TASK Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 494.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while TASK trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check TASK's competition here
CLVT vs IBEX Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while IBEX trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check IBEX's competition here
CLVT vs CD Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 377.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CD trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -118.75. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CD's competition here
CLVT vs SDHI Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 367.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while SDHI trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is 207.80. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SDHI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check SDHI's competition here
CLVT vs PSFE Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 367.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while PSFE trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check PSFE's competition here
CLVT vs TSSI Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 358.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while TSSI trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check TSSI's competition here
CLVT vs TLS Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 341.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while TLS trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -13.06. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check TLS's competition here
CLVT vs XRXDW Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while XRXDW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check XRXDW's competition here
CLVT vs SDHIU Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while SDHIU trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check SDHIU's competition here
CLVT vs UIS Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 280.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while UIS trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check UIS's competition here
CLVT vs HCKT Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while HCKT trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check HCKT's competition here
CLVT vs BULLZ Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check BULLZ's competition here
CLVT vs DMRC Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while DMRC trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -8.98. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check DMRC's competition here
CLVT vs CNDT Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CNDT trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CNDT's competition here
CLVT vs III Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 201.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while III trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas III's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to III's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check III's competition here
CLVT vs SRT Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check SRT's competition here
CLVT vs CTG Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CTG's competition here
CLVT vs WYY Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while WYY trades at $11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -61.32. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check WYY's competition here
CLVT vs TTEC Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while TTEC trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check TTEC's competition here
CLVT vs ALYA Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check ALYA's competition here
CLVT vs DVLT Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while DVLT trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check DVLT's competition here
CLVT vs CSPI Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CSPI trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -926.00. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CSPI's competition here
CLVT vs CTM Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CTM trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -35.16. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CTM's competition here
CLVT vs USIO Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while USIO trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check USIO's competition here
CLVT vs SIFYR Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check SIFYR's competition here
CLVT vs JFU Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while JFU trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check JFU's competition here
CLVT vs CLPS Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CLPS trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CLPS's competition here
CLVT vs SAIH Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while SAIH trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check SAIH's competition here
CLVT vs DTST Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while DTST trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check DTST's competition here
CLVT vs CHOW Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while CHOW trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check CHOW's competition here
CLVT vs VEEAW Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while VEEAW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check VEEAW's competition here
CLVT vs VEEA Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while VEEA trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check VEEA's competition here
CLVT vs SGLB Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check SGLB's competition here
CLVT vs GLE Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while GLE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check GLE's competition here
CLVT vs LZMH Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while LZMH trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check LZMH's competition here
CLVT vs ARBB Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while ARBB trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check ARBB's competition here
CLVT vs TDTH Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while TDTH trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check TDTH's competition here
CLVT vs LHSW Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while LHSW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check LHSW's competition here
CLVT vs SLAI Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while SLAI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check SLAI's competition here
CLVT vs JDZG Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while JDZG trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JDZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is more volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check JDZG's competition here
CLVT vs SASI Comparison June 2026
CLVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT is priced at $2.21, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT currently has a P/E ratio of -10.48, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CLVT's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT.Check SASI's competition here