3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MASK's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MASK and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MASK | $1.95 | +3.17% | 7M | 0.74 | $2.63 | N/A |
| IBM | $245.00 | -0.85% | 231.5B | 20.62 | $11.88 | +2.75% |
| ACN | $260.50 | -1.76% | 159.4B | 19.01 | $13.70 | +2.53% |
| INFY | $12.50 | -2.34% | 50.7B | 15.06 | $0.83 | +4.33% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $62.88 | +0.22% | 33.4B | 9.72 | $6.47 | N/A |
| CTSH | $64.72 | -2.74% | 28.9B | 11.75 | $5.51 | +2.01% |
| BR | $190.40 | -1.82% | 21.5B | 19.75 | $9.64 | +2.12% |
| WIT | $2.16 | +0.00% | 21.3B | 15.92 | $0.14 | +4.03% |
| CDW | $157.00 | -0.88% | 19.6B | 14.99 | $10.47 | +1.61% |
Stock Comparison
International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE: IBM)
MASK vs IBM Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 231.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while IBM trades at $245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check IBM's competition here
Accenture plc (NYSE: ACN)
MASK vs ACN Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 159.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while ACN trades at $260.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check ACN's competition here
Infosys Limited (NYSE: INFY)
MASK vs INFY Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while INFY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check INFY's competition here
Fiserv, Inc. (NYSE: FI)
MASK vs FI Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check FI's competition here
Fiserv, Inc. (NASDAQ: FISV)
MASK vs FISV Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while FISV trades at $62.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FISV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check FISV's competition here
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (NASDAQ: CTSH)
MASK vs CTSH Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CTSH trades at $64.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CTSH's competition here
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: BR)
MASK vs BR Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while BR trades at $190.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check BR's competition here
Wipro Limited (NYSE: WIT)
MASK vs WIT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while WIT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check WIT's competition here
CDW Corporation (NASDAQ: CDW)
MASK vs CDW Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CDW trades at $157.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CDW's competition here
Leidos Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: LDOS)
MASK vs LDOS Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while LDOS trades at $132.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check LDOS's competition here
CGI Inc. (NYSE: GIB)
MASK vs GIB Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while GIB trades at $83.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check GIB's competition here
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (NYSE: FIS)
MASK vs FIS Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while FIS trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check FIS's competition here
CACI International Inc (NYSE: CACI)
MASK vs CACI Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CACI trades at $611.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CACI's competition here
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (NASDAQ: JKHY)
MASK vs JKHY Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while JKHY trades at $173.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check JKHY's competition here
Gartner, Inc. (NYSE: IT)
MASK vs IT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while IT trades at $190.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IT's ROE of +21.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check IT's competition here
Wise plc (NASDAQ: WSE)
MASK vs WSE Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, WSE has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while WSE trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas WSE's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WSE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to WSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check WSE's competition here
EPAM Systems, Inc. (NYSE: EPAM)
MASK vs EPAM Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while EPAM trades at $159.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check EPAM's competition here
Genpact Limited (NYSE: G)
MASK vs G Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while G trades at $42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas G's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to G's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to G. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check G's competition here
ExlService Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXLS)
MASK vs EXLS Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while EXLS trades at $43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check EXLS's competition here
Science Applications International Corporation (NASDAQ: SAIC)
MASK vs SAIC Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while SAIC trades at $146.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check SAIC's competition here
Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (NYSE: INGM)
MASK vs INGM Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while INGM trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check INGM's competition here
Parsons Corporation (NYSE: PSN)
MASK vs PSN Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while PSN trades at $48.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check PSN's competition here
Applied Digital Corp. (NASDAQ: APLD)
MASK vs APLD Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while APLD trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -17.87. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to APLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check APLD's competition here
Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: NSIT)
MASK vs NSIT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while NSIT trades at $158.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check NSIT's competition here
Maase Inc. (NASDAQ: MAAS)
MASK vs MAAS Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, MAAS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while MAAS trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas MAAS's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAAS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to MAAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check MAAS's competition here
GDS Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: GDS)
MASK vs GDS Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while GDS trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check GDS's competition here
NCR Corporation (NYSE: NCR)
MASK vs NCR Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check NCR's competition here
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD)
MASK vs KD Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while KD trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check KD's competition here
WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS)
MASK vs WNS Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check WNS's competition here
Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFR)
MASK vs CIFR Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CIFR trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CIFR's competition here
Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRFT)
MASK vs PRFT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check PRFT's competition here
Csquare Inc. (NYSE: CSQR)
MASK vs CSQR Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CSQR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CSQR trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CSQR's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CSQR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CSQR's competition here
DXC Technology Company (NYSE: DXC)
MASK vs DXC Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while DXC trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check DXC's competition here
Globant S.A. (NYSE: GLOB)
MASK vs GLOB Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while GLOB trades at $47.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check GLOB's competition here
Concentrix Corporation (NASDAQ: CNXC)
MASK vs CNXC Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CNXC trades at $30.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CNXC's competition here
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (NASDAQ: FORTY)
MASK vs FORTY Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while FORTY trades at $110.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check FORTY's competition here
Mega Fortune Company Limited (NASDAQ: MGRT)
MASK vs MGRT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while MGRT trades at $120.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 700.29. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MGRT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check MGRT's competition here
Clarivate Plc (NYSE: CLVT)
MASK vs CLVT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CLVT trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CLVT's competition here
Thoughtworks Holding, Inc. (NASDAQ: TWKS)
MASK vs TWKS Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check TWKS's competition here
Everforth, Inc. (NYSE: EFOR)
MASK vs EFOR Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while EFOR trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check EFOR's competition here
NCR Voyix Corporation (NYSE: VYX)
MASK vs VYX Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while VYX trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check VYX's competition here
Bitfarms Ltd. (NASDAQ: BITF)
MASK vs BITF Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while BITF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BITF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check BITF's competition here
BIT Mining Limited (NYSE: BTCM)
MASK vs BTCM Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check BTCM's competition here
Innodata Inc. (NASDAQ: INOD)
MASK vs INOD Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while INOD trades at $37.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to INOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check INOD's competition here
Keel Infrastructure Corp. (NASDAQ: KEEL)
MASK vs KEEL Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while KEEL trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check KEEL's competition here
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BBAI)
MASK vs BBAI Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while BBAI trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check BBAI's competition here
Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: GDYN)
MASK vs GDYN Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while GDYN trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check GDYN's competition here
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. WT (NYSE: BBAI-WT)
MASK vs BBAI-WT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
N-able, Inc. (NYSE: NABL)
MASK vs NABL Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 912.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while NABL trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check NABL's competition here
ASGN Incorporated (NYSE: ASGN)
MASK vs ASGN Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while ASGN trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check ASGN's competition here
VNET Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: VNET)
MASK vs VNET Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 880.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while VNET trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to VNET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check VNET's competition here
SOLAI Limited (NYSE: SLAI)
MASK vs SLAI Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while SLAI trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check SLAI's competition here
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (NASDAQ: MGIC)
MASK vs MGIC Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while MGIC trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check MGIC's competition here
TaskUs, Inc. (NASDAQ: TASK)
MASK vs TASK Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 835.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while TASK trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check TASK's competition here
Cantaloupe, Inc. (NASDAQ: CTLP)
MASK vs CTLP Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CTLP trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CTLP's competition here
SharonAI Holdings, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: SHAZ)
MASK vs SHAZ Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 776.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while SHAZ trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check SHAZ's competition here
Clarivate Plc (NYSE: CLVT-PA)
MASK vs CLVT-PA Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
IBEX Limited (NASDAQ: IBEX)
MASK vs IBEX Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 659.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while IBEX trades at $49.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check IBEX's competition here
Performant Healthcare, Inc. (NASDAQ: PHLT)
MASK vs PHLT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check PHLT's competition here
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: HIVE)
MASK vs HIVE Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 488.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while HIVE trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check HIVE's competition here
Telos Corporation (NASDAQ: TLS)
MASK vs TLS Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 359.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while TLS trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check TLS's competition here
WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: WYFI)
MASK vs WYFI Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while WYFI trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check WYFI's competition here
Alight, Inc. (NYSE: ALIT)
MASK vs ALIT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 339.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while ALIT trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check ALIT's competition here
The Hackett Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HCKT)
MASK vs HCKT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while HCKT trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check HCKT's competition here
Verra Mobility Corporation (NASDAQ: VRRM)
MASK vs VRRM Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 331.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while VRRM trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check VRRM's competition here
Webull Corporation Incentive Warrant (NASDAQ: BULLZ)
MASK vs BULLZ Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check BULLZ's competition here
Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ: CNDT)
MASK vs CNDT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CNDT trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CNDT's competition here
Unisys Corporation (NYSE: UIS)
MASK vs UIS Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 194.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while UIS trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check UIS's competition here
TSS, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSSI)
MASK vs TSSI Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while TSSI trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check TSSI's competition here
Startek, Inc. (NYSE: SRT)
MASK vs SRT Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check SRT's competition here
Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. ADS (NASDAQ: LAWR)
MASK vs LAWR Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, LAWR has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while LAWR trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas LAWR's P/E ratio is -46.87. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LAWR's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to LAWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check LAWR's competition here
Computer Task Group, Incorporated (NASDAQ: CTG)
MASK vs CTG Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CTG's competition here
KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KORE)
MASK vs KORE Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while KORE trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check KORE's competition here
Alithya Group Inc. (NASDAQ: ALYA)
MASK vs ALYA Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check ALYA's competition here
Endava plc (NYSE: DAVA)
MASK vs DAVA Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, DAVA has a market cap of 94.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while DAVA trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas DAVA's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAVA's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to DAVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check DAVA's competition here
Yuanbao Inc. American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: YB)
MASK vs YB Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while YB trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to YB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check YB's competition here
CSP Inc. (NASDAQ: CSPI)
MASK vs CSPI Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CSPI trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -104.29. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CSPI's competition here
TTEC Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEC)
MASK vs TTEC Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while TTEC trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check TTEC's competition here
WidePoint Corporation (AMEX: WYY)
MASK vs WYY Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while WYY trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -48.62. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to WYY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check WYY's competition here
WISeQey Corp (NASDAQ: WQEY)
MASK vs WQEY Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, WQEY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while WQEY trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas WQEY's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WQEY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to WQEY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check WQEY's competition here
Quantum X Labs Inc. (NASDAQ: QXL)
MASK vs QXL Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while QXL trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QXL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to QXL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check QXL's competition here
Sify Technologies Limited Rights expiring 6/21/2024 (NASDAQ: SIFYR)
MASK vs SIFYR Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check SIFYR's competition here
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA)
MASK vs ZENA Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, ZENA has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while ZENA trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas ZENA's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZENA's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to ZENA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check ZENA's competition here
SAIHEAT Limited (NASDAQ: SAIH)
MASK vs SAIH Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while SAIH trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check SAIH's competition here
Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EKSO)
MASK vs EKSO Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, EKSO has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while EKSO trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas EKSO's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EKSO's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to EKSO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check EKSO's competition here
ChronoScale Corporation (NASDAQ: CHRN)
MASK vs CHRN Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CHRN has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CHRN trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CHRN's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHRN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CHRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CHRN's competition here
Castellum, Inc. (AMEX: CTM)
MASK vs CTM Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CTM trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -28.67. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CTM's competition here
Trident Digital Tech Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: TDTH)
MASK vs TDTH Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while TDTH trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -20.03. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check TDTH's competition here
CLPS Incorporation (NASDAQ: CLPS)
MASK vs CLPS Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CLPS trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CLPS's competition here
9F Inc. (NASDAQ: JFU)
MASK vs JFU Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while JFU trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to JFU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check JFU's competition here
Veea Inc. (NASDAQ: VEEA)
MASK vs VEEA Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while VEEA trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +51.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check VEEA's competition here
DarkHorse Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: DRK)
MASK vs DRK Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, DRK has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while DRK trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas DRK's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to DRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check DRK's competition here
ChowChow Cloud International Holdings Ltd. (AMEX: CHOW)
MASK vs CHOW Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CHOW trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHOW's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CHOW's competition here
Sigma Labs, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGLB)
MASK vs SGLB Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check SGLB's competition here
Alarum Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: ALAR)
MASK vs ALAR Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, ALAR has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while ALAR trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas ALAR's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to ALAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check ALAR's competition here
Veea Inc. (NASDAQ: VEEAW)
MASK vs VEEAW Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while VEEAW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +51.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check VEEAW's competition here
Cycurion, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: CYCU)
MASK vs CYCU Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while CYCU trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check CYCU's competition here
LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: LZMH)
MASK vs LZMH Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while LZMH trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check LZMH's competition here
Data Storage Corporation (NASDAQ: DTST)
MASK vs DTST Comparison November 2026
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: MASK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MASK stands at 7M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MASK is priced at $1.95 on the NASDAQ, while DTST trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MASK currently has a P/E ratio of 0.74, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 37.29. In terms of profitability, MASK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MASK is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MASK.Check DTST's competition here