Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FIS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIS | $38.17 | -3.46% | 20.7B | 7.75 | $5.16 | +4.21% |
| IBM | $271.52 | -3.31% | 260.8B | 24.86 | $11.16 | +2.47% |
| ACN | $169.38 | -2.90% | 106.8B | 14.23 | $12.19 | +3.74% |
| INFY | $11.76 | -4.23% | 49.6B | 15.30 | $0.80 | +4.40% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $52.85 | +0.25% | 28.8B | 8.35 | $6.47 | N/A |
| CTSH | $51.67 | -2.49% | 25.1B | 11.48 | $4.61 | +2.47% |
| WIT | $2.20 | +0.69% | 22.7B | 16.62 | $0.13 | +5.85% |
| BR | $142.48 | -4.36% | 17.4B | 16.03 | $9.36 | +2.60% |
| CDW | $129.93 | -3.62% | 17B | 16.24 | $8.21 | +1.95% |
Stock Comparison
FIS vs IBM Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 260.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while IBM trades at $271.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check IBM's competition here
FIS vs ACN Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while ACN trades at $169.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ACN's competition here
FIS vs INFY Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while INFY trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check INFY's competition here
FIS vs FI Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check FI's competition here
FIS vs FISV Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while FISV trades at $52.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check FISV's competition here
FIS vs CTSH Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CTSH trades at $51.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CTSH's competition here
FIS vs WIT Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while WIT trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check WIT's competition here
FIS vs BR Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while BR trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BR's competition here
FIS vs CDW Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CDW trades at $129.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CDW's competition here
FIS vs LDOS Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while LDOS trades at $123.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check LDOS's competition here
FIS vs GIB Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while GIB trades at $66.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check GIB's competition here
FIS vs AUR Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while AUR trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check AUR's competition here
FIS vs APLD Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while APLD trades at $44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -110.29. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check APLD's competition here
FIS vs CACI Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CACI trades at $527.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CACI's competition here
FIS vs JKHY Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while JKHY trades at $127.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check JKHY's competition here
FIS vs GDS Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while GDS trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check GDS's competition here
FIS vs INGM Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while INGM trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check INGM's competition here
FIS vs G Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while G trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas G's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check G's competition here
FIS vs DLB Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while DLB trades at $52.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check DLB's competition here
FIS vs EPAM Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while EPAM trades at $93.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check EPAM's competition here
FIS vs SAIC Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while SAIC trades at $114.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SAIC's competition here
FIS vs EXLS Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while EXLS trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check EXLS's competition here
FIS vs PSFE-WT Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
FIS vs NCR Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check NCR's competition here
FIS vs WAY Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while WAY trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check WAY's competition here
FIS vs WNS Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check WNS's competition here
FIS vs KEEL Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while KEEL trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check KEEL's competition here
FIS vs INOD Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while INOD trades at $104.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 88.19. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check INOD's competition here
FIS vs PRFT Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check PRFT's competition here
FIS vs PAY Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while PAY trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check PAY's competition here
FIS vs VNET Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while VNET trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check VNET's competition here
FIS vs KD Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while KD trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check KD's competition here
FIS vs NIQ Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while NIQ trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check NIQ's competition here
FIS vs NYAX Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while NYAX trades at $67.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 80.31. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check NYAX's competition here
FIS vs FORTY Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while FORTY trades at $121.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check FORTY's competition here
FIS vs FLYW Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while FLYW trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 58.88. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check FLYW's competition here
FIS vs CNXC Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CNXC trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CNXC's competition here
FIS vs GLOB Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while GLOB trades at $37.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check GLOB's competition here
FIS vs AI Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while AI trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check AI's competition here
FIS vs CLVT Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CLVT trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CLVT's competition here
FIS vs TWKS Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TWKS's competition here
FIS vs DXC Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while DXC trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 88.50. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check DXC's competition here
FIS vs BBAI Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while BBAI trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BBAI's competition here
FIS vs BTCM Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BTCM's competition here
FIS vs VYX Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 963.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while VYX trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check VYX's competition here
FIS vs WYFI Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 899.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while WYFI trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -23.53. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check WYFI's competition here
FIS vs ASGN Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while ASGN trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ASGN's competition here
FIS vs MGIC Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while MGIC trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check MGIC's competition here
FIS vs EFOR Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 841.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while EFOR trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check EFOR's competition here
FIS vs CTLP Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CTLP trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CTLP's competition here
FIS vs CLVT-PA Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
FIS vs AUROW Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 744.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while AUROW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check AUROW's competition here
FIS vs VRRM Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while VRRM trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check VRRM's competition here
FIS vs SHAZ Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 621M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while SHAZ trades at $69.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -17.62. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SHAZ's competition here
FIS vs PHLT Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check PHLT's competition here
FIS vs NABL Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 608.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while NABL trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -64.60. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check NABL's competition here
FIS vs TASK Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 516M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while TASK trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TASK's competition here
FIS vs GDYN Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while GDYN trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 101.50. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check GDYN's competition here
FIS vs IBEX Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 406.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while IBEX trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check IBEX's competition here
FIS vs CD Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 382.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CD trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -120.50. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CD's competition here
FIS vs SDHI Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 368.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while SDHI trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is 208.60. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDHI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SDHI's competition here
FIS vs PSFE Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 363.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while PSFE trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check PSFE's competition here
FIS vs TSSI Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 349M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while TSSI trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TSSI's competition here
FIS vs TLS Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 330M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while TLS trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TLS's competition here
FIS vs XRXDW Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 316.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while XRXDW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check XRXDW's competition here
FIS vs SDHIU Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while SDHIU trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SDHIU's competition here
FIS vs UIS Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 279.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while UIS trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check UIS's competition here
FIS vs HCKT Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while HCKT trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check HCKT's competition here
FIS vs BULLZ Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BULLZ's competition here
FIS vs DMRC Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while DMRC trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check DMRC's competition here
FIS vs CNDT Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CNDT trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CNDT's competition here
FIS vs BBAI-WT Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
FIS vs III Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while III trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas III's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to III's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check III's competition here
FIS vs SRT Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SRT's competition here
FIS vs CTG Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CTG's competition here
FIS vs WYY Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while WYY trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -61.32. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check WYY's competition here
FIS vs DVLT Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while DVLT trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check DVLT's competition here
FIS vs ALYA Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ALYA's competition here
FIS vs TTEC Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while TTEC trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TTEC's competition here
FIS vs CSPI Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CSPI trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -821.00. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CSPI's competition here
FIS vs CTM Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CTM trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -34.76. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CTM's competition here
FIS vs SIFYR Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SIFYR's competition here
FIS vs USIO Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while USIO trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check USIO's competition here
FIS vs JFU Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while JFU trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check JFU's competition here
FIS vs CLPS Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CLPS trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CLPS's competition here
FIS vs DTST Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while DTST trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check DTST's competition here
FIS vs SAIH Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while SAIH trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SAIH's competition here
FIS vs VEEA Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while VEEA trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check VEEA's competition here
FIS vs VEEAW Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while VEEAW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check VEEAW's competition here
FIS vs CHOW Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while CHOW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check CHOW's competition here
FIS vs LZMH Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while LZMH trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check LZMH's competition here
FIS vs SGLB Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SGLB's competition here
FIS vs GLE Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while GLE trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check GLE's competition here
FIS vs ARBB Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while ARBB trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check ARBB's competition here
FIS vs TDTH Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while TDTH trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check TDTH's competition here
FIS vs LHSW Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while LHSW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check LHSW's competition here
FIS vs SLAI Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while SLAI trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SLAI's competition here
FIS vs JDZG Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while JDZG trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JDZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is more volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check JDZG's competition here
FIS vs SASI Comparison June 2026
FIS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIS stands at 20.7B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIS is priced at $38.17, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.75, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FIS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FIS is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIS.Check SASI's competition here