GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See GFS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for GFS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFS | $38.62 | +6.22% | 21.2B | 21.21 | $1.82 | +0.62% |
| NVDA | $186.64 | +2.78% | 4.5T | 31.97 | $5.84 | +0.28% |
| TSM | $375.44 | +6.33% | 1.9T | 24.37 | $15.40 | +1.00% |
| AVGO | $293.69 | +0.74% | 1.4T | 30.10 | $9.76 | +0.89% |
| SKHYV | $168.01 | +12.76% | 1.2T | 39.55 | $4.25 | N/A |
| SKHY | $127.34 | +2.78% | 903.1B | 7.05 | $18.05 | +0.02% |
| MU | $690.00 | +5.12% | 780.2B | 9.13 | $75.51 | +0.08% |
| AMD | $449.04 | +11.04% | 730.8B | 77.72 | $5.76 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,424.75 | +5.02% | 548.9B | 35.54 | $40.07 | +0.66% |
| INTC | $56.28 | +7.71% | 299.3B | 98.79 | $0.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA)
GFS vs NVDA Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while NVDA trades at $186.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVDA's competition here
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (NYSE: TSM)
GFS vs TSM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while TSM trades at $375.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TSM's competition here
Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ: AVGO)
GFS vs AVGO Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AVGO trades at $293.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AVGO's competition here
SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV)
GFS vs SKHYV Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SKHYV has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while SKHYV trades at $168.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SKHYV's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SKHYV's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SKHYV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SKHYV's competition here
SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHY)
GFS vs SKHY Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 903.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while SKHY trades at $127.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SKHY's competition here
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU)
GFS vs MU Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 780.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while MU trades at $690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MU's competition here
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD)
GFS vs AMD Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 730.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AMD trades at $449.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 77.72. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMD's competition here
ASML Holding N.V. (NASDAQ: ASML)
GFS vs ASML Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 548.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ASML trades at $1,424.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASML's competition here
Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC)
GFS vs INTC Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 299.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while INTC trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 98.79. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INTC's competition here
Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMAT)
GFS vs AMAT Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 264.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AMAT trades at $332.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMAT's competition here
Texas Instruments Incorporated (NASDAQ: TXN)
GFS vs TXN Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 253.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while TXN trades at $277.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TXN's competition here
Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX)
GFS vs LRCX Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 250.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while LRCX trades at $200.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LRCX's competition here
Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: ARM)
GFS vs ARM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 186.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ARM trades at $174.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 98.57. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ARM's competition here
KLA Corporation (NASDAQ: KLAC)
GFS vs KLAC Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while KLAC trades at $138.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KLAC's competition here
QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ: QCOM)
GFS vs QCOM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 176.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while QCOM trades at $165.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QCOM's competition here
Analog Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADI)
GFS vs ADI Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 176B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ADI trades at $363.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 36.84. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ADI's competition here
Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRVL)
GFS vs MRVL Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 123.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while MRVL trades at $141.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MRVL's competition here
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE: ASX)
GFS vs ASX Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ASX trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASX's competition here
NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ: NXPI)
GFS vs NXPI Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while NXPI trades at $248.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NXPI's competition here
TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL)
GFS vs TEL Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while TEL trades at $207.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TEL's competition here
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: MPWR)
GFS vs MPWR Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while MPWR trades at $1,190.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 63.11. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MPWR's competition here
STMicroelectronics N.V. (NYSE: STM)
GFS vs STM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while STM trades at $41.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 70.69. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check STM's competition here
United Microelectronics Corporation (NYSE: UMC)
GFS vs UMC Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while UMC trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check UMC's competition here
Teradyne, Inc. (NASDAQ: TER)
GFS vs TER Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while TER trades at $218.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TER's competition here
Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: ALAB)
GFS vs ALAB Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ALAB trades at $190.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 76.77. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALAB's competition here
Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ: MCHP)
GFS vs MCHP Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while MCHP trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MCHP's competition here
Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ: MCHPP)
GFS vs MCHPP Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MCHPP has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while MCHPP trades at $52.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MCHPP's P/E ratio is 76.73. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCHPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MCHPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MCHPP's competition here
ON Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: ON)
GFS vs ON Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ON trades at $63.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ON's competition here
Qnity Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: Q)
GFS vs Q Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while Q trades at $117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check Q's competition here
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (NASDAQ: CRDO)
GFS vs CRDO Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while CRDO trades at $120.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CRDO's competition here
Cerebras Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRS)
GFS vs CBRS Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while CBRS trades at $89.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -2243.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CBRS's competition here
Entegris, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENTG)
GFS vs ENTG Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ENTG trades at $127.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ENTG's competition here
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTSI)
GFS vs MTSI Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while MTSI trades at $210.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 47.39. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MTSI's competition here
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (NASDAQ: TSEM)
GFS vs TSEM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while TSEM trades at $137.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 48.02. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TSEM's competition here
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: LSCC)
GFS vs LSCC Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while LSCC trades at $105.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 68.18. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LSCC's competition here
SiTime Corporation (NASDAQ: SITM)
GFS vs SITM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while SITM trades at $416.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 67.45. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SITM's competition here
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: SWKS)
GFS vs SWKS Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while SWKS trades at $82.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SWKS's competition here
Qorvo, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRVO)
GFS vs QRVO Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while QRVO trades at $114.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QRVO's competition here
Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ: NVMI)
GFS vs NVMI Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while NVMI trades at $313.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVMI's competition here
Wolfspeed, Inc. (NASDAQ: CREE)
GFS vs CREE Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CREE's competition here
Semtech Corporation (NASDAQ: SMTC)
GFS vs SMTC Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while SMTC trades at $103.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 56.09. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SMTC's competition here
Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO)
GFS vs ONTO Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ONTO trades at $173.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 35.72. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ONTO's competition here
Amkor Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMKR)
GFS vs AMKR Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AMKR trades at $32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMKR's competition here
Rambus Inc. (NASDAQ: RMBS)
GFS vs RMBS Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while RMBS trades at $74.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check RMBS's competition here
Brooks Automation, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRKS)
GFS vs BRKS Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check BRKS's competition here
Silicon Laboratories Inc. (NASDAQ: SLAB)
GFS vs SLAB Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while SLAB trades at $221.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 145.72. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SLAB's competition here
FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM)
GFS vs FORM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while FORM trades at $81.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check FORM's competition here
Cirrus Logic, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRUS)
GFS vs CRUS Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while CRUS trades at $113.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CRUS's competition here
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (NASDAQ: SIMO)
GFS vs SIMO Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while SIMO trades at $162.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SIMO's competition here
Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI)
GFS vs PI Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while PI trades at $171.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 84.66. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PI's competition here
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALGM)
GFS vs ALGM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ALGM trades at $28.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 52.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALGM's competition here
Synaptics Incorporated (NASDAQ: SYNA)
GFS vs SYNA Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while SYNA trades at $116.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SYNA's competition here
Camtek Ltd. (NASDAQ: CAMT)
GFS vs CAMT Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while CAMT trades at $97.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CAMT's competition here
MaxLinear, Inc. (NASDAQ: MXL)
GFS vs MXL Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while MXL trades at $49.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 86.21. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MXL's competition here
Diodes Incorporated (NASDAQ: DIOD)
GFS vs DIOD Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while DIOD trades at $77.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 42.04. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check DIOD's competition here
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: KLIC)
GFS vs KLIC Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while KLIC trades at $64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KLIC's competition here
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACLS)
GFS vs ACLS Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ACLS trades at $99.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ACLS's competition here
ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACMR)
GFS vs ACMR Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ACMR trades at $44.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ACMR's competition here
IPG Photonics Corporation (NASDAQ: IPGP)
GFS vs IPGP Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while IPGP trades at $65.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 67.28. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check IPGP's competition here
Ambarella, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMBA)
GFS vs AMBA Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AMBA trades at $58.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 88.67. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMBA's competition here
AXT, Inc. (NASDAQ: AXTI)
GFS vs AXTI Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AXTI trades at $38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -161.87. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AXTI's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUST)
GFS vs OUST Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while OUST trades at $34.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -42.44. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check OUST's competition here
Veeco Instruments Inc. (NASDAQ: VECO)
GFS vs VECO Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while VECO trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VECO's competition here
Power Integrations, Inc. (NASDAQ: POWI)
GFS vs POWI Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while POWI trades at $40.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check POWI's competition here
Navitas Semiconductor Corp (NASDAQ: NVTS)
GFS vs NVTS Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while NVTS trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -45.24. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVTS's competition here
nLIGHT, Inc. (NASDAQ: LASR)
GFS vs LASR Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while LASR trades at $38.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 79.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LASR's competition here
Penguin Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: PENG)
GFS vs PENG Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while PENG trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PENG's competition here
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: UCTT)
GFS vs UCTT Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while UCTT trades at $41.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check UCTT's competition here
Cohu, Inc. (NASDAQ: COHU)
GFS vs COHU Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while COHU trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -213.78. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check COHU's competition here
Aehr Test Systems (NASDAQ: AEHR)
GFS vs AEHR Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AEHR trades at $53.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 1784.33. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AEHR's competition here
Photronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLAB)
GFS vs PLAB Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while PLAB trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PLAB's competition here
SkyWater Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYT)
GFS vs SKYT Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while SKYT trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SKYT's competition here
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. (NASDAQ: IMOS)
GFS vs IMOS Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while IMOS trades at $43.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check IMOS's competition here
Himax Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: HIMX)
GFS vs HIMX Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while HIMX trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 41.26. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check HIMX's competition here
Wolfspeed Inc. (NYSE: WOLF)
GFS vs WOLF Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while WOLF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check WOLF's competition here
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ: ICHR)
GFS vs ICHR Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ICHR trades at $30.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 60.71. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ICHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ICHR's competition here
SMART Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGH)
GFS vs SGH Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SGH's competition here
Ambiq Micro, Inc. (NYSE: AMBQ)
GFS vs AMBQ Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 932.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AMBQ trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMBQ's competition here
Arteris, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIP)
GFS vs AIP Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 874.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AIP trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -63.54. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIP's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AIP's competition here
Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ)
GFS vs DQ Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 855.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while DQ trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check DQ's competition here
Aeva Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AEVA)
GFS vs AEVA Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 765.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -7.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AEVA's competition here
CEVA, Inc. (NASDAQ: CEVA)
GFS vs CEVA Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 762.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while CEVA trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 67.71. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CEVA's competition here
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (NASDAQ: AOSL)
GFS vs AOSL Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 716.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while AOSL trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -81.52. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AOSL's competition here
POET Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: POET)
GFS vs POET Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 670M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while POET trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check POET's competition here
Kopin Corp. (NASDAQ: KOPN)
GFS vs KOPN Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 564.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while KOPN trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 76.45. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KOPN's competition here
indie Semiconductor, Inc. (NASDAQ: INDI)
GFS vs INDI Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while INDI trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INDI's competition here
NVE Corporation (NASDAQ: NVEC)
GFS vs NVEC Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 368.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while NVEC trades at $75.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVEC's competition here
Transphorm, Inc. (NASDAQ: TGAN)
GFS vs TGAN Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TGAN's competition here
Everspin Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRAM)
GFS vs MRAM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while MRAM trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -29.46. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MRAM's competition here
Amtech Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASYS)
GFS vs ASYS Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ASYS trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASYS's competition here
Quantum eMotion Corp. (AMEX: QNC)
GFS vs QNC Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while QNC trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is -18.94. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QNC's competition here
SEALSQ Corp (NASDAQ: LAES)
GFS vs LAES Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 186.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while LAES trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LAES's competition here
inTEST Corporation (AMEX: INTT)
GFS vs INTT Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while INTT trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INTT's competition here
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. WT (NYSE: VLN-WT)
GFS vs VLN-WT Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 155.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while VLN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VLN-WT's competition here
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (NYSE: VLN)
GFS vs VLN Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 152.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while VLN trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VLN's competition here
QuickLogic Corporation (NASDAQ: QUIK)
GFS vs QUIK Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 147.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while QUIK trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QUIK's competition here
O2Micro International Limited (NASDAQ: OIIM)
GFS vs OIIM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check OIIM's competition here
Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU)
GFS vs ALMU Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ALMU trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -58.17. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALMU's competition here
Atomera Incorporated (NASDAQ: ATOM)
GFS vs ATOM Comparison November 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 21.2B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $38.62 on the NASDAQ, while ATOM trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.21, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ATOM's competition here