ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ON) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ON | $116.81 | -3.38% | 45.9B | 86.67 | $1.35 | N/A |
| NVDA | $204.74 | -1.87% | 5T | 31.93 | $6.52 | +0.14% |
| TSM | $424.59 | -0.52% | 2.2T | 36.73 | $11.65 | +0.78% |
| AVGO | $378.87 | -4.47% | 1.9T | 65.03 | $6.03 | +0.67% |
| MU | $988.90 | +4.17% | 1.1T | 44.21 | $21.17 | +0.06% |
| AMD | $509.30 | +3.87% | 775.4B | 159.57 | $2.98 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,869.25 | +6.87% | 685.2B | 59.18 | $30.04 | +0.51% |
| INTC | $123.60 | +12.09% | 542.4B | -179.87 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| LRCX | $367.57 | +13.29% | 409.1B | 61.84 | $5.29 | +0.31% |
| AMAT | $561.35 | +14.06% | 396.4B | 46.87 | $10.65 | +0.38% |
Stock Comparison
ON vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while NVDA trades at $204.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check NVDA's competition here
ON vs TSM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while TSM trades at $424.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check TSM's competition here
ON vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AVGO trades at $378.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 65.03. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AVGO's competition here
ON vs MU Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while MU trades at $988.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 44.21. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check MU's competition here
ON vs AMD Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 775.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AMD trades at $509.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 159.57. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AMD's competition here
ON vs ASML Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 685.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ASML trades at $1,869.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 59.18. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ASML's competition here
ON vs INTC Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 542.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while INTC trades at $123.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -179.87. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check INTC's competition here
ON vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 409.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while LRCX trades at $367.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 61.84. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check LRCX's competition here
ON vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 396.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AMAT trades at $561.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 46.87. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AMAT's competition here
ON vs ARM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 345.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ARM trades at $367.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 377.74. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ARM's competition here
ON vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 279.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while KLAC trades at $248.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 60.78. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check KLAC's competition here
ON vs TXN Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 262.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while TXN trades at $300.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 49.76. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check TXN's competition here
ON vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 233.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while MRVL trades at $280.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 92.03. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check MRVL's competition here
ON vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while QCOM trades at $212.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check QCOM's competition here
ON vs ADI Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ADI trades at $418.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ADI's competition here
ON vs ASX Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ASX trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 52.36. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ASX's competition here
ON vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while MPWR trades at $1,577.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 109.19. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check MPWR's competition here
ON vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while NXPI trades at $303.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check NXPI's competition here
ON vs STM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while STM trades at $77.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 458.25. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check STM's competition here
ON vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ALAB trades at $377.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 229.33. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ALAB's competition here
ON vs TER Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while TER trades at $399.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 68.37. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check TER's competition here
ON vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while CBRS trades at $209.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 527.48. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check CBRS's competition here
ON vs UMC Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while UMC trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check UMC's competition here
ON vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while MCHP trades at $94.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 415.77. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check MCHP's competition here
ON vs GFS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while GFS trades at $81.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 50.85. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check GFS's competition here
ON vs Q Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while Q trades at $149.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check Q's competition here
ON vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while MTSI trades at $378.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 152.65. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check MTSI's competition here
ON vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while TSEM trades at $260.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 102.28. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check TSEM's competition here
ON vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ENTG trades at $149.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 77.66. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ENTG's competition here
ON vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while LSCC trades at $145.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 982.57. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check LSCC's competition here
ON vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AMKR trades at $80.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AMKR's competition here
ON vs SITM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while SITM trades at $724.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -701.62. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check SITM's competition here
ON vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while NVMI trades at $573.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 64.55. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check NVMI's competition here
ON vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while RMBS trades at $148.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 69.92. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check RMBS's competition here
ON vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while SMTC trades at $166.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -384.20. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check SMTC's competition here
ON vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ONTO trades at $317.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 127.46. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ONTO's competition here
ON vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AAOI trades at $168.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -250.58. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AAOI's competition here
ON vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while SWKS trades at $73.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check SWKS's competition here
ON vs CREE Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check CREE's competition here
ON vs FORM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while FORM trades at $137.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 138.64. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check FORM's competition here
ON vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while SIMO trades at $274.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 51.44. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check SIMO's competition here
ON vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ALGM trades at $48.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -582.87. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ALGM's competition here
ON vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while QRVO trades at $98.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check QRVO's competition here
ON vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while CRUS trades at $164.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check CRUS's competition here
ON vs VSH Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while VSH trades at $58.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 5859.00. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check VSH's competition here
ON vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check BRKS's competition here
ON vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while CAMT trades at $194.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 171.58. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check CAMT's competition here
ON vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while SLAB trades at $218.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -143.01. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check SLAB's competition here
ON vs MXL Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while MXL trades at $81.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -47.77. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check MXL's competition here
ON vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while NVTS trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -36.27. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check NVTS's competition here
ON vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while KLIC trades at $112.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 99.65. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check KLIC's competition here
ON vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ACMR trades at $96.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 62.08. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ACMR's competition here
ON vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ACLS trades at $178.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 51.11. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ACLS's competition here
ON vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while SYNA trades at $136.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -104.70. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check SYNA's competition here
ON vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while DIOD trades at $108.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 56.56. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check DIOD's competition here
ON vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while IPGP trades at $114.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 156.43. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check IPGP's competition here
ON vs POWI Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while POWI trades at $78.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 249.03. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check POWI's competition here
ON vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while UCTT trades at $107.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.42. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check UCTT's competition here
ON vs VECO Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while VECO trades at $75.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 176.82. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check VECO's competition here
ON vs PI Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while PI trades at $131.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -138.93. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check PI's competition here
ON vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AXTI trades at $96.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -244.87. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AXTI's competition here
ON vs LASR Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while LASR trades at $70.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -211.60. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check LASR's competition here
ON vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while HIMX trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 96.16. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check HIMX's competition here
ON vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AEHR trades at $106.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -248.18. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AEHR's competition here
ON vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AMBA trades at $67.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -40.84. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AMBA's competition here
ON vs COHU Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while COHU trades at $60.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -46.21. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check COHU's competition here
ON vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ICHR trades at $85.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -48.38. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ICHR's competition here
ON vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while WOLF trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check WOLF's competition here
ON vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while IMOS trades at $61.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 74.15. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check IMOS's competition here
ON vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while PLAB trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check PLAB's competition here
ON vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while SKYT trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check SKYT's competition here
ON vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AMBQ trades at $84.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AMBQ's competition here
ON vs AIP Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AIP trades at $37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -42.73. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AIP's competition here
ON vs POET Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while POET trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -12.82. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check POET's competition here
ON vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while AOSL trades at $45.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check AOSL's competition here
ON vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while CEVA trades at $45.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -93.61. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check CEVA's competition here
ON vs SGH Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check SGH's competition here
ON vs INDI Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 849.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while INDI trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check INDI's competition here
ON vs QNC Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 642.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while QNC trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check QNC's competition here
ON vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 545.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while MRAM trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2328.00. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check MRAM's competition here
ON vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 508.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while NVEC trades at $116.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check NVEC's competition here
ON vs LAES Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 439.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while LAES trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check LAES's competition here
ON vs XPER Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 367.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while XPER trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check XPER's competition here
ON vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 349.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while QUIK trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -26.27. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check QUIK's competition here
ON vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check TGAN's competition here
ON vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 319.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ALMU trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -64.46. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ALMU's competition here
ON vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 276.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ASYS trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 105.94. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ASYS's competition here
ON vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 261.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ATOM trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -12.38. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ATOM's competition here
ON vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 242.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while GSIT trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check GSIT's competition here
ON vs MX Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 228.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while MX trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -15.32. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check MX's competition here
ON vs VLN Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 226.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while VLN trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check VLN's competition here
ON vs INTT Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 196.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while INTT trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 390.50. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check INTT's competition here
ON vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while BZAI trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check BZAI's competition here
ON vs VLN-WT Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check VLN-WT's competition here
ON vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while GCTS trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check GCTS's competition here
ON vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check OIIM's competition here
ON vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while ARBE trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check ARBE's competition here
ON vs TRT Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while TRT trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 250.25. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check TRT's competition here
ON vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
ON plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ON stands at 45.9B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ON is priced at $116.81, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ON currently has a P/E ratio of 86.67, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, ON's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ON is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ON.Check IDBA's competition here