Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PENG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENG | $64.60 | -0.05% | 3.2B | 81.17 | $0.76 | N/A |
| SNDK | $1,939.36 | +18.11% | 243.8B | 56.33 | $29.23 | N/A |
| APH | $152.58 | +6.26% | 189.5B | 42.80 | $3.60 | +0.56% |
| GLW | $177.11 | -5.56% | 149.7B | 83.63 | $2.08 | +0.67% |
| TEL | $209.20 | +1.74% | 61.6B | 21.57 | $9.78 | +1.44% |
| KEYS | $347.34 | +4.75% | 56.6B | 53.43 | $6.20 | N/A |
| COHR | $379.36 | -5.62% | 56.4B | 168.69 | $2.11 | N/A |
| FLEX | $150.34 | -0.32% | 53.9B | 63.45 | $2.32 | N/A |
| GRMN | $239.38 | +1.76% | 45.9B | 26.55 | $8.96 | +1.55% |
| CLS | $388.42 | +0.50% | 42.8B | 45.02 | $8.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PENG vs SNDK Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 243.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SNDK trades at $1,939.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNDK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SNDK's competition here
PENG vs APH Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 189.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while APH trades at $152.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 42.80. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check APH's competition here
PENG vs GLW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 149.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while GLW trades at $177.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 83.63. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check GLW's competition here
PENG vs TEL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while TEL trades at $209.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check TEL's competition here
PENG vs KEYS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while KEYS trades at $347.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 53.43. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check KEYS's competition here
PENG vs COHR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while COHR trades at $379.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 168.69. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check COHR's competition here
PENG vs FLEX Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while FLEX trades at $150.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check FLEX's competition here
PENG vs GRMN Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while GRMN trades at $239.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check GRMN's competition here
PENG vs CLS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while CLS trades at $388.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 45.02. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check CLS's competition here
PENG vs JBL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while JBL trades at $381.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 48.84. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check JBL's competition here
PENG vs IIVI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check IIVI's competition here
PENG vs TDY Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while TDY trades at $622.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check TDY's competition here
PENG vs MKSI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while MKSI trades at $351.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 65.10. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MKSI's competition here
PENG vs FN Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while FN trades at $594.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 50.43. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check FN's competition here
PENG vs TTMI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while TTMI trades at $192.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 94.49. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check TTMI's competition here
PENG vs WDCVV Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check WDCVV's competition here
PENG vs SANM Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SANM trades at $250.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 51.46. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SANM's competition here
PENG vs VICR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while VICR trades at $300.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 94.49. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check VICR's competition here
PENG vs TRMB Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while TRMB trades at $49.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check TRMB's competition here
PENG vs LFUS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while LFUS trades at $471.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -269.82. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check LFUS's competition here
PENG vs CGNX Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while CGNX trades at $62.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 72.14. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check CGNX's competition here
PENG vs ESE Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while ESE trades at $314.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 59.94. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ESE's competition here
PENG vs PLXS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while PLXS trades at $291.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check PLXS's competition here
PENG vs ST Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while ST trades at $49.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 150.45. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ST's competition here
PENG vs NOVT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while NOVT trades at $160.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 114.75. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check NOVT's competition here
PENG vs MDA Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while MDA trades at $37.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 66.14. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MDA's competition here
PENG vs OLED Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while OLED trades at $90.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OLED's competition here
PENG vs VNT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while VNT trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check VNT's competition here
PENG vs BMI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while BMI trades at $134.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BMI's competition here
PENG vs ITRI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while ITRI trades at $81.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ITRI's competition here
PENG vs OSIS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while OSIS trades at $229.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OSIS's competition here
PENG vs BELFB Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while BELFB trades at $301.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 66.36. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BELFB's competition here
PENG vs BHE Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while BHE trades at $89.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 92.26. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BHE's competition here
PENG vs BELFA Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while BELFA trades at $266.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 59.15. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BELFA's competition here
PENG vs ROG Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while ROG trades at $150.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -45.86. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ROG's competition here
PENG vs OUST Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while OUST trades at $38.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -41.42. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OUST's competition here
PENG vs NOVTU Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while NOVTU trades at $68.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check NOVTU's competition here
PENG vs CTS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while CTS trades at $67.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check CTS's competition here
PENG vs VPG Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while VPG trades at $141.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 272.60. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check VPG's competition here
PENG vs ALNT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while ALNT trades at $93.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 60.78. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ALNT's competition here
PENG vs BKSY Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while BKSY trades at $32.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BKSY's competition here
PENG vs DAKT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 940.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while DAKT trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check DAKT's competition here
PENG vs KODK Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 924.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while KODK trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check KODK's competition here
PENG vs FARO Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check FARO's competition here
PENG vs SATL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 771.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SATL trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SATL's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SATL's competition here
PENG vs LYTS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 764.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while LYTS trades at $26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check LYTS's competition here
PENG vs OUST-WTA Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
PENG vs LPTH Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 673.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while LPTH trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -28.14. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check LPTH's competition here
PENG vs MLAB Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 602.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while MLAB trades at $107.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 90.11. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MLAB's competition here
PENG vs AMOT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check AMOT's competition here
PENG vs OPTX Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 468.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while OPTX trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -145.37. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OPTX's competition here
PENG vs OPTXW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 468.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while OPTXW trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OPTXW's competition here
PENG vs OUST-WT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OUST-WT's competition here
PENG vs MEI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 381.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while MEI trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MEI's competition here
PENG vs SLNHP Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SLNHP trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SLNHP's competition here
PENG vs VLDR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check VLDR's competition here
PENG vs BKSY-WT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
PENG vs MPTI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while MPTI trades at $96.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 35.24. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MPTI's competition here
PENG vs RELL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 235.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while RELL trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 60.22. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check RELL's competition here
PENG vs SATLW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SATLW trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SATLW's competition here
PENG vs SLNH Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SLNH trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SLNH's competition here
PENG vs EMAN Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check EMAN's competition here
PENG vs KULR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 171.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while KULR trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check KULR's competition here
PENG vs USBC Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 132M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while USBC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check USBC's competition here
PENG vs MVIS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while MVIS trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MVIS's competition here
PENG vs CPSH Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 110M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while CPSH trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 227.00. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check CPSH's competition here
PENG vs GNSS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while GNSS trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check GNSS's competition here
PENG vs SOTK Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SOTK trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 47.55. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SOTK's competition here
PENG vs LINK Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while LINK trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -53.22. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check LINK's competition here
PENG vs WRAP Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while WRAP trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check WRAP's competition here
PENG vs ODYS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while ODYS trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ODYS's competition here
PENG vs ELTK Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while ELTK trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -19.73. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ELTK's competition here
PENG vs MIND Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while MIND trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 65.56. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MIND's competition here
PENG vs DSWL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while DSWL trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check DSWL's competition here
PENG vs UEIC Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while UEIC trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check UEIC's competition here
PENG vs NSYS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while NSYS trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is 44.66. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check NSYS's competition here
PENG vs AMPGR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while AMPGR trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check AMPGR's competition here
PENG vs AMPGZ Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while AMPGZ trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check AMPGZ's competition here
PENG vs ACFN Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while ACFN trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ACFN's competition here
PENG vs LGL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while LGL trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 695.00. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check LGL's competition here
PENG vs WATT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while WATT trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check WATT's competition here
PENG vs ISNS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ISNS's competition here
PENG vs DAIO Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while DAIO trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check DAIO's competition here
PENG vs WBX Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while WBX trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check WBX's competition here
PENG vs ELSE Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while ELSE trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.00. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ELSE's competition here
PENG vs REFR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while REFR trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check REFR's competition here
PENG vs TMPOW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check TMPOW's competition here
PENG vs HOLO Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while HOLO trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check HOLO's competition here
PENG vs HOLOW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while HOLOW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check HOLOW's competition here
PENG vs NEON Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while NEON trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check NEON's competition here
PENG vs SGMA Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SGMA's competition here
PENG vs VIAO Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check VIAO's competition here
PENG vs KNW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check KNW's competition here
PENG vs SELX Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SELX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SELX's competition here
PENG vs MTEK Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while MTEK trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MTEK's competition here
PENG vs GAUZ Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while GAUZ trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check GAUZ's competition here
PENG vs SVRE Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SVRE trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SVRE's competition here
PENG vs OST Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OST's competition here
PENG vs SVREW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $64.60, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 81.17, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SVREW's competition here